<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MS Virtual PC vs VirutalBox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solitarygeek.com/virtualization/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solitarygeek.com/virtualization/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/</link>
	<description>Technical Productivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 07:48:44 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 4sysops - Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 SP1 vs. Sun xVM VirtualBox 2.1.0</title>
		<link>http://www.solitarygeek.com/virtualization/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>4sysops - Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 SP1 vs. Sun xVM VirtualBox 2.1.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesselvakumar.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>[...] edition. You might be able to get Linux running on Virtual PC if you are a geek. But many report problems and it is not officially supported. VirtualBox on the other hand isn&#8217;t that choosy about the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] edition. You might be able to get Linux running on Virtual PC if you are a geek. But many report problems and it is not officially supported. VirtualBox on the other hand isn&#8217;t that choosy about the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F3ca</title>
		<link>http://www.solitarygeek.com/virtualization/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>F3ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesselvakumar.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>The screen resolution can be anything after you installed &quot;add-ons&quot;, and set the virtual box configuration correctly. (Preferences--&gt;display).

After this you can _resize_ the virtualbox&#039;s window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The screen resolution can be anything after you installed &#8220;add-ons&#8221;, and set the virtual box configuration correctly. (Preferences&#8211;&gt;display).</p>
<p>After this you can _resize_ the virtualbox&#8217;s window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latee Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.solitarygeek.com/virtualization/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Latee Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesselvakumar.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>I have been using Virtual PC 2007 for over a year now and from what I know it has &#039;mouse integration&#039;, you install the &#039;Integrated mouse&#039; and the features that allow you to access USB devices after you have installed your support Guest OS by selection from the Menu: Action &gt; Install or Update Virtual Machine Additions

You can find more information in the Help Topics, here is some info:

Virtual Machine Additions includes the following features:

Drag and drop
Folder sharing
&#039;Integrated mouse&#039;
Optimized video drivers
Time synchronization
Clipboard sharing
Improved operating system performance
&#039;Dynamic resizing of the virtual machine window, which automatically adjusts the size of the guest operating system desktop&#039;...


See &#039;Using removable media, drives, and other devices&#039; in the Help Topics for accessing USB devices; it is done by using shared folders.

Anyway, I thought some of you might like to know, otherwise I am sorry for waisting your time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Virtual PC 2007 for over a year now and from what I know it has &#8216;mouse integration&#8217;, you install the &#8216;Integrated mouse&#8217; and the features that allow you to access USB devices after you have installed your support Guest OS by selection from the Menu: Action &gt; Install or Update Virtual Machine Additions</p>
<p>You can find more information in the Help Topics, here is some info:</p>
<p>Virtual Machine Additions includes the following features:</p>
<p>Drag and drop<br />
Folder sharing<br />
&#8216;Integrated mouse&#8217;<br />
Optimized video drivers<br />
Time synchronization<br />
Clipboard sharing<br />
Improved operating system performance<br />
&#8216;Dynamic resizing of the virtual machine window, which automatically adjusts the size of the guest operating system desktop&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>See &#8216;Using removable media, drives, and other devices&#8217; in the Help Topics for accessing USB devices; it is done by using shared folders.</p>
<p>Anyway, I thought some of you might like to know, otherwise I am sorry for waisting your time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kasim Hansia</title>
		<link>http://www.solitarygeek.com/virtualization/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Kasim Hansia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesselvakumar.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>For a better resolution in Ubuntu after installing VirtualBox add-ons, do the following

1. Backup /etc/X11/xorg.conf by using the following command
sudo cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup

Then edit the xorg.conf using nano, pico, vi or gedit so that it looks like the following below

    Section &quot;Device&quot;
        Identifier    &quot;Configured Video Device&quot;
        Driver        &quot;vesa&quot;
        Option        &quot;UseFBDev&quot;        &quot;true&quot;
    EndSection

    Section &quot;Monitor&quot;
        Identifier    &quot;Configured Monitor&quot;
        Option        &quot;DPMS&quot;
        HorizSync        30-70
        VertRefresh     50-160
    EndSection

    Section &quot;Screen&quot;
        Identifier    &quot;Default Screen&quot;
        Monitor        &quot;Configured Monitor&quot;
        Device        &quot;Configured Video Device&quot;
        DefaultDepth    16
        SubSection &quot;Display&quot;
            Depth    16
            Modes    &quot;1024×768&quot; &quot;800×600&quot;
        EndSubSection
    EndSection


THAT&#039;S IT. REBOOT YOUR VIRTUAL UBUNTU BOX.

When you try to configure your display/screen resolution, it&#039;ll give you more resolution options.

Enjoy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a better resolution in Ubuntu after installing VirtualBox add-ons, do the following</p>
<p>1. Backup /etc/X11/xorg.conf by using the following command<br />
sudo cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup</p>
<p>Then edit the xorg.conf using nano, pico, vi or gedit so that it looks like the following below</p>
<p>    Section &#8220;Device&#8221;<br />
        Identifier    &#8220;Configured Video Device&#8221;<br />
        Driver        &#8220;vesa&#8221;<br />
        Option        &#8220;UseFBDev&#8221;        &#8220;true&#8221;<br />
    EndSection</p>
<p>    Section &#8220;Monitor&#8221;<br />
        Identifier    &#8220;Configured Monitor&#8221;<br />
        Option        &#8220;DPMS&#8221;<br />
        HorizSync        30-70<br />
        VertRefresh     50-160<br />
    EndSection</p>
<p>    Section &#8220;Screen&#8221;<br />
        Identifier    &#8220;Default Screen&#8221;<br />
        Monitor        &#8220;Configured Monitor&#8221;<br />
        Device        &#8220;Configured Video Device&#8221;<br />
        DefaultDepth    16<br />
        SubSection &#8220;Display&#8221;<br />
            Depth    16<br />
            Modes    &#8220;1024×768&#8243; &#8220;800×600&#8243;<br />
        EndSubSection<br />
    EndSection</p>
<p>THAT&#8217;S IT. REBOOT YOUR VIRTUAL UBUNTU BOX.</p>
<p>When you try to configure your display/screen resolution, it&#8217;ll give you more resolution options.</p>
<p>Enjoy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JKD</title>
		<link>http://www.solitarygeek.com/virtualization/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>JKD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 07:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesselvakumar.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>I didnt know MS VPC has USB Support..Could you clarify on that please?
Thank you!

D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didnt know MS VPC has USB Support..Could you clarify on that please?<br />
Thank you!</p>
<p>D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.solitarygeek.com/virtualization/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesselvakumar.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t diss Virtual PC just because it&#039;s a MS product.  Keep in mind VirtualBox is only for home/personal use, so violating the license is not a difficult thing to do.

On technical details, network bridge (all OSes) &amp; USB support (Windows) is quite seamless in Virtual PC compared to VirtualBox.  As you say, VirtualBox&#039;s mouse integration is good in Linux OSes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t diss Virtual PC just because it&#8217;s a MS product.  Keep in mind VirtualBox is only for home/personal use, so violating the license is not a difficult thing to do.</p>
<p>On technical details, network bridge (all OSes) &amp; USB support (Windows) is quite seamless in Virtual PC compared to VirtualBox.  As you say, VirtualBox&#8217;s mouse integration is good in Linux OSes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klemen</title>
		<link>http://www.solitarygeek.com/virtualization/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Klemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesselvakumar.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>virtualbox is much easier to use, you cen share files with primary computers easly, and what is more important you dont need to fuck, with reading cd/dvd and usb devices, like in virtual pc.I spent 4hours yust to figure it out how you share files.Stupid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>virtualbox is much easier to use, you cen share files with primary computers easly, and what is more important you dont need to fuck, with reading cd/dvd and usb devices, like in virtual pc.I spent 4hours yust to figure it out how you share files.Stupid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-03-24 &#124; Lazycoder</title>
		<link>http://www.solitarygeek.com/virtualization/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-03-24 &#124; Lazycoder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesselvakumar.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>[...] MS Virtual PC vs VirutalBox « James Selvakumar’s Blog Interesting, mouse support in VirtualBox works for Linux. Virtual PC it doesn&#8217;t. (tags: virtualization lazycoder) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MS Virtual PC vs VirutalBox « James Selvakumar’s Blog Interesting, mouse support in VirtualBox works for Linux. Virtual PC it doesn&#8217;t. (tags: virtualization lazycoder) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Selvakumar</title>
		<link>http://www.solitarygeek.com/virtualization/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>James Selvakumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesselvakumar.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Hi sweemeng,
Yes, I like the &quot;seamless&quot; mode in virtualbox very much. In fact, i would say that it is one of the feature which made me to switch to virtualbox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi sweemeng,<br />
Yes, I like the &#8220;seamless&#8221; mode in virtualbox very much. In fact, i would say that it is one of the feature which made me to switch to virtualbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Selvakumar</title>
		<link>http://www.solitarygeek.com/virtualization/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>James Selvakumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesselvakumar.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/ms-virtual-pc-vs-virutalbox/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Hi miwabba,
Thank you very much for pointing out the mistakes. I will try to correct that in my future posts. (I use firefox only but didn&#039;t spend much time in the suggestions it offered to correct the spelling mistakes)
Any way, thank you very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi miwabba,<br />
Thank you very much for pointing out the mistakes. I will try to correct that in my future posts. (I use firefox only but didn&#8217;t spend much time in the suggestions it offered to correct the spelling mistakes)<br />
Any way, thank you very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
